MENU
  • Enom.com
  • Resellers

Enom Blog

Uncategorized
Category

  • The nTLD Reseller Starter Guide: Which new gTLDs should I offer?

    November 14, 2017

    Uncategorized

     Like

    Views: 8193

    If you currently sell or are considering selling domain names as part of a business, you may have asked this question to yourself before. The huge variety of gTLDs out there can turn the task of curating a lineup that makes sense for your business into a rather daunting undertaking. Instead of getting bogged down by all the variables that could weigh into your final decision, I suggest you focus on the handful of key considerations that really matter. The questions below will help you better evaluate TLDs and equip you to make smart choices as you expand or refocus your offering. And in case you still feel stuck, we’ve included a list of extensions you might consider.

    Is the TLD easy to implement?

    Most of the new gTLDs fall into the “easy-to-implement” category, free to be registered by anyone, anywhere, much like a .COM. Others have strict registration requirements, such as a local presence in their associated geographic area, or an affiliation with a particular professional group. If you ever need to verify whether an extension you’re considering is restricted, take a quick look at our TLD reference chart.

    The TLDs we’ll highlight in this post are all easy to implement, but that’s not to say you should steer clear of those that are restricted. In fact, offering restricted TLDs can be a great way to cater to a niche market. For example, many firms might find the credibility of a .LAW extension advantageous. Similarly, the appeal of geoTLDs like .NYC, .BARCELONA, or .BERLIN among local citizens make them a great choice if you attract a significant volume of customers in any of these cities. If you think you’re likely to sell a high volume of a certain restricted extension, the payoff may well be worth the extra implementation efforts involved. It really comes down to knowing your audience and presenting them with options they are likely to find meaningful.

    Is there a high level of interest in the TLD?

    Unless you’re catering to a highly specific market, you’ll benefit from starting with TLDs that have wide appeal. This appeal can be generated by both the generic nature of the extension (.WEBSITE or .ONLINE), or its specificity (.CLOUD, .BLOG, .SHOP, .STORE or .DESIGN). Note that each of those last five extensions has an unambiguous meaning that resonates with a huge number of potential buyers.

    This doesn’t mean a small TLD offering shouldn’t include more niche extensions. Again, the level of interest your customers show for a particular TLD will always depend on who your customers are. I had a musician friend, for example, that was thrilled to launch her new business with a .STUDIO name. And I’m willing to bet there are a lot of artists out there who might be open to a similar departure from the traditional, more corporate-sounding extensions.

    Does the pricing make sense?

    Most potential nTLD buyers compare new possibilities to .COM alternatives. So presenting them with fresh, viable options in a similar price range is smart. There are many solid performers, with broad applications, that fall into this category. Of course, this isn’t to say that a high price tag should deter you from offering an extension that seems particularly well-suited to your customer base.

    It’s also not just the initial purchase price you should be aware of. Simple and predictable pricing structures are an important factor in building an enduring customer base. So while offering TLDs with substantial first-year discounts might translate into increased registrations, you could find yourself unpleasantly surprised by relatively low renewal rates. A customer who purchases a domain on promotion might not be put off by a slightly higher renewal fee. But there are numerous registries that present enticing first-year TLD price tags in the .COM range, with renewal fees that might be 10x greater. These kinds of discrepancies not only deter savvy buyers from making the initial purchase, and put a dent in your renewal rates, but also place you at risk of angering customers who are caught totally off guard by the increase.

    In short, it’s advantageous to offer first-year promotional prices, as they can be a real incentive to potential buyers. But it’s also important to make sure you’re transparent about the renewal price, displaying it clearly within your purchase flow. For those who sell domains as a part of a larger bundle or package, the renewal price, and the margin it allows for, should be factored into your pricing structure.

    Is the renewal rate and customer quality fairly high?

    It’s been a few years since the launch of the first nTLDs, which means we’re now in a much better position to evaluate their long-term potential. When determining the value of a new extension, look into its renewal rate and whether its registrations are, generally, being used in a meaningful way. Arguably, there’s a link between the two.

    That latter point is what I mean by “customer quality”. If you’re a hosting provider or CMS business, you stand to make more money off customers who are actually using their domains. They’re certainly far more likely to show interest in email, SSL and hosting services. They’re also more likely to renew. Not to mention, there’s a case to be made that websites that have valuable content, and employ a new TLD, effectively function as an advertisement for the extension itself. That certainly can’t hurt an extension’s organic growth over time.

    In this regard, .BLOG is a standout – according to ntldstats, only 27% of its registrations are “parked”, a term applied to any domain “in use as a parking page [displaying ads], or without any content.” To put this number in perspective, the average parked page percentage for the TLDs we highlight in the chart below is roughly 53%.

    Still feeling a little lost?

    That’s fair! The paradox of choice is a powerful thing. Here are some suggestions that might serve as good place to start. Judging them based on the checklist above, these TLDs don’t necessarily score high across the board, but they are all easy-to-implement and offer the potential to target a sizable audience – some because of their generic nature and global recognizability, and others because of their appeal to a specific, but substantial, market.

    To reinforce my early point: while we haven’t focused on geoTLDs in this post, they represent a sizable portion of the nTLD pie. Depending on your target market, they can be incredibly profitable.

    If you’re ready to explore what options might work best for your business, you can view all available TLDs at enom.com.

    Read More

  • Google and Symantec resolve Chrome browser trust issues

    September 21, 2017

    Advice, Announcement, SSL, Uncategorized

     Like

    Views: 5342

    Update: February 8, 2018

    This blog post is a follow-up to the
    information we published a few months ago regarding the Google-Symantec conundrum.

    Symantec and Google have agreed on a plan that requires Symantec to migrate certificate validation to a third party. In exchange, Google would ensure that the Chrome browser  continues to trust Symantec certificates validated by this third party. Shortly thereafter, DigiCert announced its plan to acquire Symantec’s Website Security Business by the end of 2017. With this acquisition, Digicert would effectively take over the validation for all of Symantec’s certificate brands by December 1st, 2017, which would satisfy the asks of the browser community.

    In light of these changes, Google has announced an updated plan as to how Chrome would deal with certificates issued by DigiCert’s validation infrastructure. This plan has received some coverage in the media, stating that Google would no longer trust any Symantec certificate brand by 2018. This information is incomplete, incorrect and it has created some confusion and uncertainty. Here’s what you need to know:

    • From December 1, 2017, all Symantec certificate brands (Symantec, GeoTrust, Thawte and RapidSSL) will be issued from DigiCert’s validation platform and Chrome will trust those certificates. For clarity: the Symantec certificate brands will continue to exist after December 2017, they will only be issued from a different, upgraded validation platform. Google will continue to trust all Symantec certificates that have been issued from this new platform after December 1st, 2017.


    What does this mean if you have a certificate from any of the Symantec brands?

     

    Certificates issued prior to June 1, 2016

    If you have a certificate that has been issued prior to June 1, 2016, the Chrome browser will no longer trust this certificate after March 15, 2018. In order to retain trust by the Chrome browser, you need to replace this certificate. Some important dates to keep in mind:

    • If the certificate expires prior to March 15, 2018, you need to do nothing. The certificate will continue to be trusted by Chrome until it expires.
    • If the certificate expires after March 15, 2018, but before September 13, 2018, you can re-issue this certificate any time before March 15, 2018.
    • If the certificate expires after September 13, 2018, you will need to re-issue the certificate before March 15, 2018.


    Certificates issued after June 1, 2016

    If you have an existing certificate that has been issued after June 1, 2016, the Chrome browser will no longer trust this certificate after September 13, 2018. Some important dates to keep in mind:

    • If the certificate expires prior to September 13, 2018, you need to do nothing. The certificate will continue to be trusted by Chrome until it expires.
    • If the certificate expires after September 13, 2018, you will need to re-issue the certificate before September 13, 2018.
    • If you have purchased a certificate after December 1, 2017, the Chrome browser will trust this certificate. You will not be required to re-issue.

    It is safe to continue to use Symantec certificates, but you will need to keep some of these key dates in mind to avoid any disruption. If your certificate has been purchased at any time with a 1-year validity period, it is very likely that no action is required on your part.

    We would like to remind you that re-issues for the Symantec family of certificates (Symantec, Thawte, GeoTrust, RapidSSL) can be done free of charge.

    Read More

  • System vulnerability surrounding first-level .UK domains

    September 7, 2017

    Uncategorized

     Like

    Views: 3399

    Last week we sent an email to all Enom resellers who have a .UK domain in their account letting them know that we had identified and patched a vulnerability issue that allowed for zero-confirmation first-level .UK domain transfers between Enom reseller accounts. It’s important to note that second-level .UK domains such as .co.uk and .org.uk were never affected. The patch consisted of disallowing our system from auto approving inter-account domain transfer requests for first-level .UK domains forcing transfers to go through the proper FOA process. Today we deployed a permanent fix that fully resolves the issue.

    The issue was first brought to Enom’s attention by an Enom reseller and the m group security advisory team. Due to a series of internal miscommunications, the issue was not escalated correctly and the update required to correct the issue took longer than we would have expected. We are currently doing our due diligence to understand what happened, why it happened, and why the proper escalation procedure was not followed. We do not take any of these issues lightly and we’ll take the necessary steps to improve our internal escalation process immediately.

    Please note that no other TLDs were impacted. The .UK domains in your Enom account are not at risk and no action is required on your part.

    If you have any concerns, please contact support at customercare@enom.com

    Read More

  • auDA directs Enom to discontinue .au registrations for all Chinese resellers

    August 24, 2017

    Uncategorized

     Like

    Views: 5080

    Enom is no longer able to provide .au domain registrations to any reseller that is based in China. This follows a formal direction Tucows was given by auDA, the registry for the Australian top-level domain, .au.

    In a letter we received today, auDA is directing Tucows, under the terms of our accreditation agreement with auDA, not to deal with any reseller based in China in relation to .au domain names. auDA cited an increased number of complaints they have received in recent months regarding domains that were fraudulently registered using unauthorized Australian business information. Those registrations, as auDA determined, appear to have originated from resellers based in China.

    Enom is required to comply with auDA’s direction and will disallow all resellers who are based in China from any domain registration involving a .au domain name, regardless if those registrations would be fraudulent or not. We understand that auDA’s measure may disrupt legitimate business of resellers, solely based on their location, and apologize for any inconvenience this may cause to our resellers in this market.

    Read More

  • Why are ccTLDs so complicated?

    August 1, 2017

    Industry Insight, Uncategorized

     Like

    Views: 7495

    This industry is complicated. Recently, we shed some light on how the domain channel operates, and the unique roles that ICANN, registrars, registries, resellers, and registrants play within this interconnected system. In the world of generic top-level domains, like .COM and .ORG, the channel structure is at least clearly defined, although registration policies and requirements vary among the different domain extensions. With country code top-level domains (ccTLDs) however, things get a bit more complicated.

    What’s unique about the ccTLD channel?
    1. Governments often set the technical and procedural policies

    As their name would suggest, country code top-level domains are allocated to nations or states. In most cases, the government itself determines the policies for its ccTLD, and appoints a registry to enforce them. Depending on the history of a particular ccTLD, the Registry could be a number of different institutions, such as:

    • A government ministry, such as in Barbados (.BB), Finland (.FI), or Samoa (.WS);
    • A telecom, such as in Yemen (.YE), the United Arab Emirates (.AE), or San Marino (.SM);
    • A university, such as in Bosnia And Herzegovina (.BA), the Bahamas (.BS), or Chile (.CL);
    • A private company, such as in Austria (.AT), Greenland (.GS), or Puerto Rico (.PR);
    • A not-for profit organization, such as in Armenia (.AM), Belgium (.BE), or New Zealand (.NZ).
    2. There are three different ccTLD channel models

    While gTLDs all operate within a standard channel structure (ICANN → Registry → Registrar → Reseller → Registrant) ccTLDs work a little differently.

    Registry-Registrar Model

    Some ccTLDs follow a Registry-Registrar model, which functions much like the gTLD model. The Registry only offers registrations and domain management through accredited Registrars. Sometimes these ccTLDs are open for anyone to register and sometimes they are restricted to local nationals. Still, many of these Registries offer the Registrar a formal registration portal and API so that domain management can be automated.

    Registry-Registrant Model

    Some ccTLDs do not accredit Registrars at all and instead work directly with Registrants. Registrars can still manage these domains, but must often log into an individual account and make changes to these domains manually. Registries with this model usually require the Registrant to be a local national or to supply documentation before they can register or manage their domain.

    Mixed Registry- Registrar/Registrant Model

    Though it’s rare, some ccTLD Registries work both with Registrars and directly with Registrants. Registrants pay much higher prices than Registrars do to manage their domains directly with the Registry. This model often leads to confusion for Registrants since management and registration processes may be different for Registrars than for Registrants.

    Why does this matter to you?

    When any registry makes a significant policy or procedural change, there are often important consequences for us and our customers. However, the ccTLD system is particularly vulnerable to change. Since governments are often involved in the decision-making process, changes to requirements, processes, and pricing can happen overnight. What’s more, many organizations that operate ccTLD Registries have very little knowledge of the domain industry, receive little funding, or operate the Registry as a public service. This means that processes can be complicated, prices high, and information scarce.

    Hopefully, this leaves you with a better understanding of why ccTLD registration and management can be more cumbersome than that of gTLDs. While changes at the registry level may be out of our control, we’ll always adapt to them using a strategy that minimizes the impact on you and your business. Our goal is to make it easy for you to take advantage of our extensive ccTLD and gTLD selection.

    Read More

« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »

FEATURED POSTS

  • How to Win by Treating Your Customers as Members

    August 13, 2020

  • A Great Domain for Freelancers and Entrepreneurs? Try .ME

    June 22, 2020

  • Bandzoogle: website builder for musicians

    June 1, 2020

  • security lock and credit cards on keyboard

    Avoiding COVID-19 Cyberattacks with Security Best-Practices

    April 28, 2020

CATEGORIES

  • Advice
  • Announcement
  • Developers
  • DNS
  • Featured
  • Fun
  • GDPR
  • Industry Insight
  • New TLDs
  • News
  • Premium Domains
  • Promotion
  • Resellers
  • Roadmap
  • SSL
  • Uncategorized
  • WTB

ARCHIVES

  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2013
Support

Report Abuse
Help Center
Contact Us

Resources

WHOIS Lookup
Maintenance Alerts
Developers
Products & Services

Domain Name Search
Premium Domains
Web Hosting
SSL Certificates
Website Builder
Basic Email
Bulk Tools

© 2021 Enom Blog |